USPTO serial 79438494
WONDERLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON KENNEDY, HEATHER N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with WONDERLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T Kucala Jr
Joseph T Kucala Jr KUCALA BURGETT LAW LLCPO Box 547New Lenox, IL 60451United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Powdered milk; whey powder; buttermilk; edible powdered milk; freeze-dried vegetables; edible flowers, dried; lactic acid drinks; all the aforesaid goods do not include ice cream, plant-based milk substitutes or nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |