USPTO serial 79438501
ULTIMA ULTIMATE AESTHETICS SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL,JUNA QUEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTIMA ULTIMATE AESTHETICS SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Laser hair removal apparatus, other than for medical purposes; depilation appliances; depilation appliances, electric and non-electric | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | LED facial aesthetic treatment apparatus, namely, apparatus using a light emitting diode (LED) for performing aesthetic facial treatment procedures; electric acupuncture instruments; esthetic massage apparatus for household purposes; physical therapy equipment in the nature of electric muscle stimulation apparatus; LED masks for therapeutic purposes; massage apparatus, electric or non-electric; electric esthetic massage apparatus for household purposes; electrotherapy instruments for firming treatments; electric facial aesthetic treatment apparatus, other than facial steamers; apparatus for the electrical stimulation of groups of muscles for physical therapy purposes; electro medical instruments for use in treating muscles by electric stimulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |