USPTO serial 79438619
AVR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene Minx
Charlene Minx Minx Law, PC401 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1200Santa Monica, CA 90401United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots; collaborative industrial robots; none of the aforementioned for use with agricultural machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Data processing apparatus, computers, digital controls being electronic controllers, programmable logic controllers, laser oscillators, downloadable and recorded computer software; all the aforesaid products being for controlling, simulating and regulating robots; educational robots in the nature of teaching robots; laboratory robots; apparatus and instruments intended for controlling and regulating robots, namely, electronic robot controllers, programmable logic controllers, digital signal processors, remote controls, and electronic pendants; none of the aforementioned for use with agricultural machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Transporting robots in the nature of robotic delivery vehicles and autonomous land vehicles for transporting goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Servicing, installation and repair of robots; providing information with respect to the repair of robots | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services provided by computer technicians, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in robots, by a telephone hotline and by means of remote diagnostic and maintenance software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AVR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |