USPTO serial 79438848
NAVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEISECKI, MARK A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Broder
Robert S. Broder COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 Northern BoulevardRoslyn, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Raking machines; rammers; crushing machines, namely, stem crushing machines; rammers being machines; power jacks; compressors for machines; agricultural machines, namely, potato handling equipment being pilers, loaders, eliminators being machines for removing unwanted debris from harvested root crops, conveyors and harvesters being machines, self-propelled picking machines, self-propelled harvesting machines; diggers being machines, namely, power-operated chain-type trenching machines for digging trenches; atomizing machines, namely, fertilizer spraying machines, power-operated industrial atomizers for spraying liquids for pest/insect/weed control and for fertilization; stalk separators being agricultural machines; filling machines; driving motors, other than for land vehicles; grain separating machines; belt conveyors; metal drawing machines; threshing machines; earth moving machines; braiding machines; conveyors being machines; grating machines for vegetables; reapers; grain husking machines; winnowers; grain milling machines; chaff cutter blades /or electric cha// cutters; tedding machines; agricultural implements other than hand operated hand tools, namely, power-operated cultivators; reapers and threshers; agricultural machines, namely, potato handling equipment being pilers, loaders, eliminators being machines for removing unwanted debris from harvested root crops, conveyors and harvesters being machines; mixing machines; rakes for raking machines; root slicers being machines; agricultural seed planting machines, namely, sowers; cutting machines; sifting machines; weeding machines; machine tools, namely, metalworking machine tools, potato handling equipment being pilers, loaders, eliminators, conveyors and harvesters; waste compacting machines; straw chaff cutters; trailed agricultural machines; drawn diggers; drawn harvesting machines. | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Driving motors for land vehicles. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 25, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |