Drawing for EV MILLS

USPTO serial 79438853

EV MILLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LADNER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EV MILLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

Daniel I. Schloss GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLPOne Vanderbilt AvenueNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal working machines; toolholders for metalworking machines [machine parts]; milling machines; milling cutters being machine tools; milling bits for power operated machines; indexable carbide inserts for power-operated milling tools; indexable carbide inserts for power-operated turning tools; drilling machines; drilling bits for power operated drill machines; Centering drilling bits being parts of machines; tool bits for machines; pneumatic hand-held drills; electrical drills; drill chucks being parts of machines for power drills; power tools, namely, end mills; threading machines; cutting tool bits for power operated machines; taps being machine tools; cutting machines for metalworking; thread milling cutters being machine tools; turning tools for machining center; reamers being machine tools; machine tool holders; metalworking machine tools; drilling machines for metalworking; power tools, namely, routers for metalworking; router bit for metalworking; dies for use with machine tools; diamond-pointed metal-cutting machine tools; diamond-pointed metal-cutting wheel machine tools; collets for power tools; drilling machines and parts therefor; Centering drilling bits being parts of machining centers for metalworking; metalworking machines, namely, milling cutters for machining centers; milling cutters for milling machines; broaches being machine tools; lathes; chucks for power drills; drill chucks for power drill machines; power tools, namely, routers; taps being parts of machines, engines, or motors; drills for the mining industry.ACTIVE—
008Drill chucks for hand-operated tools; hand tools, namely, reamers; Hand-operated milling cutters; Hand tools, namely, bolt cutters; bits for hand drills; drill bits for use in hand tools; cutting inserts in the nature of blades for use with hand tools; hand-operated drill presses; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated tools, namely, impact hand drills; hand drills, hand-operated; pipe cutters, hand-operated; cutting dies for use with hand-operated tools; Hand-operated tools, namely, rotary metal cutting tools; Hand-operated tools, namely, cutting discs; portable multi-function hand tools composed primarily of pocket knives and also including screwdrivers, files; hand-operated sanders; Hand-operated tools, namely, routers; Hand-operated tools, namely, snips; Hand operated reamers; taps being hand tools; hand taps; Hand-operated tools, namely, rotary milling cutters; Hand-operated tools, namely, rotary hand drillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance