Drawing for KAIYO SEAFOOD

USPTO serial 79438942

KAIYO SEAFOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KAIYO SEAFOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carissa L. Weiss

Carissa L. Weiss Law Office of Carissa L. Weiss, PLLC745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500New York, NY 10151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Shrimps, not live; shelled prawns; shrimp meat floss; fish, preserved; fish, not live; fish, seafood and molluscs, not live; salted fish; smoked fish; cooked fish; fish, processed; frozen fish; prepared dishes consisting primarily of fish; fish and chips; frozen meals consisting primarily of fish; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; fish fillets; fish-based foodstuffs, namely, fish-based snack foods, fish croquettes; fish cakes; fish sticks; fish ballsACTIVE—
030Shrimp dumplings; fish dumplings; all of the foregoing excluding sushiACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 20, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance