Drawing for MAXAEM

USPTO serial 79439043

MAXAEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSGOOD, KRYSTINA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXAEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Stohry

Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Batteries; batteries for pocket lamps; battery charge devices; batteries for lighting; auxiliary battery packs; power supply devices, namely, power supplies for battery chargers; electric power distribution units; electrical cells; reserve electrical power supply apparatus other than generators, namely, power supplies; fuel cells; fuel cell stacks; radios; portable radiosACTIVE—
011Torches, namely, electric torches for lighting; torches, namely, flashlights; lamps; apparatus and devices for lighting, namely, LED lighting apparatus; heating installations for fluids; heating installations, electric; space heaters, electricACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance