Drawing for IMPACTINATOR

USPTO serial 79439069

IMPACTINATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUTTON, CATHERINE ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPACTINATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Unworked or semi-worked safety glass for industrial applications, not for building, including multi-layered composite impact resistant safety glass; Unworked or semiworked glass and tempered glass, not for building, as semi-finished productsACTIVE—
035Wholesale store services in the field of glass, tempered glass, and safety glass, each as semi-finished products; Retail store services in the field of glass, tempered glass, and safety glass, each as semi-finished productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance