USPTO serial 79439093
MARE & MARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, ALLYSON B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARE & MARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish, tinned; fish-based foodstuffs; fish, preserved; salted fish; molluscs, not live; shrimp paste; shrimp floss; fish, seafood and molluscs, not live; processed fish; frozen cooked fish; fish sticks; fish croquettes; fish sausages; dishes of fish; boiled and dried fish; fish cakes; frozen shellfish; fish stock; smoked fish; dried fish; dried prawns; shelled prawns; shrimp meat floss; fish in olive oil; fish spread; pickled fish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |