Drawing for CLEANMAP

USPTO serial 79439156

CLEANMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 645Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 645: Status 645 means the USPTO mailed a final refusal maintaining at least one objection to your application. You can respond, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or allow the application to abandon.

Need help with CLEANMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Perry

David M. Perry Attorney of Record, PA Bar Member130 N. 18th StreetOne Logan Square, 8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Recycling services, namely, waste recycling services; waste treatment services, namely, extraction of elements contained in waste residues; waste treatment services, namely, extraction of ammonium phosphate from mining waste or other sources; recycling of waste; recycling, resource recovery services and treatment of waste and rubbish; recycling and waste treatment services in the nature of extraction of minerals from mining waste; recycling of waste and recovery in the nature of upcycling and reuse of waste products; treatment being reclamation and recovery in the nature of recycling and reclamation of usable materials from waste; treatment of material from waste; treatment being reclamation of cement, marble, stone, blocks, bricks, posts, slabs, panels and rocks from hazardous products; recycling of minerals; recycling of metals; recycling of valuable materials; information, advice and consultancy services relating to the recycling and recovery in the nature of resource recovery of waste and rubbish, in particular from mines; extraction of elements contained in waste residues; waste treatment services, namely, extraction of minerals contained in waste residues; water purification services; recycling of minerals, mineral processing and production of minerals in the nature of mineral refining services; waste treatment services, namely, extraction of minerals from mine waste or other sources; production in the nature of extraction and separation of minerals and processing of apatite ore; waste treatment services, namely, production of nutrients through the extraction of ammonium phosphate from mining waste or other sourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 7, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 3, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 14, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance