Drawing for SOUND POD

USPTO serial 79439345

SOUND POD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUND POD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANGEL MIGUEL MUNOZ

ANGEL MIGUEL MUNOZ MUNOZ-LOPEZ & ASSOCIATES PLLC305 BROADWAY, FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Soundproof enclosures, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths of metal; soundproof enclosures substantially made of metal, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths of metal; prefabricated soundproof booths of metal; prefabricated soundproof booths substantially made of metal; metal structures, namely, building panels of metal incorporating acoustic insulation; acoustic insulation structures being transportable constructions substantially made of metal; metal building structures in the nature of audio booths, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths of metal; building structures in the nature of audio booths substantially made of metal, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths of metal; metallic transportable prefabricated soundproof structures; transportable prefabricated soundproof structures substantially made of metal; structural parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
019Soundproof enclosures and structures, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths not of metal; soundproof enclosures and structures, namely, prefabricated soundproof booths substantially made of wood; non-metallic building structures in the nature of audio booths being prefabricated soundproof booths; building structures in the nature of audio booths being prefabricated soundproof booths substantially made of wood; non-metallic transportable constructions being acoustic insulation structures; transportable acoustic insulation structures being constructions substantially made of wood; structural parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
020Furniture; work stations being furniture, namely, desks, chairs; enclosures, namely, acoustic insulating furniture partitions; seats being furniture; structural parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 9, 2026OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 8, 2026OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2026OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jul 8, 2026ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance