USPTO serial 79439392
R-BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R-BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUNNY S. NASSIM
SUNNY S. NASSIM JACOBSON RUSSELL SALTZ NASSIM & DE LA TO1880 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Refining equipment for alkali metal compounds, namely, refining machines for alkali metal compounds; refining equipment for lithium, namely, refining machines for lithium; refining machines for alkali metal compounds; refining machines for lithium; skid-mounted alkali metal compound refining machines; electrolysis components being parts of lithium and alkali metal refining machines; electrodialysis components being parts of lithium and alkali metal refining machine; gas diffusion electrodes being machine parts for industrial refining of lithium and alkali metal compounds; parts, fittings and accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |