Drawing for SONAV

USPTO serial 79439564

SONAV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONAV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Neurosurgical catheters in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance