Drawing for CQ CONQUER

USPTO serial 79439652

CQ CONQUER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANCA, ALBERTO I
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CQ CONQUER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sangwon Kim

Sangwon Kim Revolution IP, PLLC2000 Duke Street, Suite 300Alexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing of leather, namely, pants, t-shirts, dresses; wind resistant jackets; gloves as clothing; socks; hats; clothing, namely, neck warmers; anoraks; clothing, namely, pants, t-shirts, dresses; pants; shirts; tee-shirts; belts for clothing made of leather; money belts for clothing; motorcyclists' clothing, namely, pants, t-shirts, dresses; waterproof suits for motorcyclists; motorcycle gloves; motorcycle jackets; boots for motorcycling; clothing in the nature of face coverings, not for medical and sanitary purposes, namely, face masks being headwear, niqabs, balaclavasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 8, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance