USPTO serial 79439869
ROLL'BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VELTEN, MALLORY KATE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLL'BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connor W. Oswalt
Connor W. Oswalt IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Road, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Oysters, not live; fish, not live; crustaceans, not live; shellfish, not live; prepared entrees and appetizers consisting primarily of seafood, namely, oysters, fish, crustaceans, and shellfish; frozen pre-packaged entrees and appetizers consisting primarily of seafood, namely, oysters, fish, crustaceans, and shellfish | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Live oysters; live fish; live shellfish; live crustaceans; spats being oyster larvae, live | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |