Drawing for ESSENCIEL

USPTO serial 79439949

ESSENCIEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARMON KENNEDY, HEATHER N
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENCIEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

YEONJIN SON

YEONJIN SON ACI LAW GROUP, PC6 Centerpointe Dr.Suite 630La Palma, CA 90623

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; non-medicated skin care preparations; skin cleansing foams; hair shampoo; non-medicated toiletry preparations; tissues impregnated with a skin cleanser, cosmetic lotions, make-up removing preparations; sun creams; colour cosmetics, namely, cheek colors, eyebrow colors, hair color, color cosmetics for children; lip balm; face and body creamsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance