USPTO serial 79439958
STINIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STINIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Konkel
Laura M. Konkel Michael Best & Friedrich LLP790 N. Water Street, Suite 2500Milwaukee, WI 53202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal products, namely, parts and accessories for lifting and hoisting devices in the nature of chains and grabs being attachments that clamp, grip, and transport material | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Hoisting and lifting apparatus and devices, namely, hoists, cranes, loading and unloading machines, cargo and container handling machines, lifting machines for handling containers and freight and cargo, spreaders in the nature of devices used to distribute load weight and stabilize objects, lifting frames for supporting heavy loads, grabs being attachments that clamp and grip and transport material, headblocks that gather and guide ropes and cables, mechanical and hydraulic actuators, and structural and replacement parts thereof; parts and accessories for hoisting and lifting apparatus and devices, namely, locks, mechanical container engagement and securing devices, and load positioning, guiding, and stabilizing mechanisms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |