Drawing for D5 RENDER

USPTO serial 79440155

D5 RENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with D5 RENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Priscilla Lauren Speer

Priscilla Lauren Speer Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs RoadHenderson, NV 89014United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and recorded computer software platforms for processing images, graphics and text; downloadable computer software applications for rendering images and graphics; downloadable computer programs for rendering images and graphics; downloadable electronic publications, namely, guides in the field of using software for rendering images and graphics; recorded computer software for rendering images and graphics; downloadable mobile applications for rendering images and graphics; computer memory devices; data processing apparatus; calculating machinesACTIVE—
042Architectural design; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing images, graphics and text; computer programming; computer software design; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; maintenance of computer software; hosting computer websites; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for rendering images and graphics; computer software consultancy; updating of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance