Drawing for 212

USPTO serial 79440285

212

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 212?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. King

Jennifer L. King MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1400Arlington, VA 22201United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electric vehicles, namely, electric passenger cars, electric MPVs, electric SUVs, electric vans, electric pickup trucks, electric light-duty trucks, electric golf carts; electric locomotives; vehicles for locomotion by land, air, water or rail, namely, electric passenger cars, electric MPVs, electric SUVs, electric vans, electric pickup trucks, electric light-duty trucks, electric golf carts; remote control land vehicles, other than toys; motor coaches; lorries; motorcycles; automobiles; sports utility vehicles (SUVs); bicycles.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 12, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2025SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance