Drawing for CLEAN2HEM

USPTO serial 79440326

CLEAN2HEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN2HEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duncan Stark

Duncan Stark thyssenkrupp North America, LLC9450 SW Gemini Dr., Suite 28424IP ServicesBeaverton, OR 97008-7105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cleaning apparatus and cleaning equipment, namely, motor-driven brush cleaning machines for cleaning digital roller hemming heads; cleaning stations, namely, motor-driven brush cleaning machines for cleaning hemming rollers of metalworking machines used in vehicle body manufacturing; motor-driven brush cleaning machines for cleaning hemming machines and structural parts therefor; automated brush cleaning machines, namely, motor-driven brush cleaning machines for cleaning hemming rollers and roller hemming heads; swiveling motor-driven brush cleaning machines for cleaning digital roller hemming headsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance