Drawing for MEATYBIND

USPTO serial 79440429

MEATYBIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEATYBIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy D. Spier

Jeremy D. Spier Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5200Atlanta, GA 30308United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Proteins for use in industry; unprocessed artificial resins and plastics, all for industrial use; proteins for use in manufacture; proteins for pet food production and feed industry use; fertilizersACTIVE—
005Protein dietary supplements; protein supplements for animalsACTIVE—
031Foodstuffs and fodder for animalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 24, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance