USPTO serial 79440489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Greger
Jeffrey H. Greger STUDEBAKER BRACKETT PLLC8255 Greensboro DriveSuite 300Tysons, VA 22102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Construction materials of metal; corrosion-resistant nickel alloys for construction and coating; structural curing nickel alloys for structures exposed to high temperatures; nickel alloy coatings for protection against corrosion caused by molten salts | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacturing and treatment services for metal alloys; smelting and forging services for metal alloys; additive manufacturing by laser and other additive manufacturing techniques for production of parts made of nickel alloys | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development in the field of corrosion-resistant materials; research and development of nickel-based metal alloys; studies and analyses of materials for applications in highly corrosive environments; engineering services; design and development of structures and parts made of metal alloys; engineering advice for selection and application of corrosion-resistant metal alloys; design services for optimizing parts and structures for maximum resistance to corrosive environments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |