Drawing for KLARIO

USPTO serial 79440499

KLARIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHERMAN, GENEVA R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLARIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynda J. Zadra-Symes

Lynda J. Zadra-Symes Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th floorIrvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for implementing workflow procedures and managing workflow; downloadable computer software for providing business intelligence; downloadable computer software for use in improving performance, speed, and accuracy of business, financial, and database software; all being, relating to or connected with enterprise resource planning (ERP) softwareACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for implementing workflow procedures and managing workflow; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for implementing workflow procedures and managing workflow; Providing online non-downloadable software for providing business intelligence; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing business intelligence; Providing online nondownloadable software for use in improving performance, speed, and accuracy of business, financial, and database software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in improving performance, speed, and accuracy of business, financial, and database software; technology consulting services in the field of computer software; technology consulting services in the field of use of data processing programs; all relating to or connected with enterprise resource planning (ERP) softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance