Drawing for OMBLE

USPTO serial 79440540

OMBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with OMBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mariya Ortynska

43 West 43rd StreetNew York, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of documentsACTIVE—
042Cloud computing; hosting of software as a service (SaaS)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 22, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 7, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance