USPTO serial 79440558
AIRFENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AIRFENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Cominolli
Elizabeth A. Cominolli Markert & Cominolli PLLC100 S. Clinton Ave., 24th FloorRochester, NY 14604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated drone detection system comprised of Infrared detection apparatus, motion detectors, radio frequency receivers, software-defined radio apparatus, computer hardware, computer software, and antennas; detection apparatus, namely, radio frequency signal detectors, electronic apparatus for detecting radio frequency signals emitted by unmanned aerial vehicles; downloadable aerial threat detection software; navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making equipment, namely, GPS receivers, electronic tracking devices for monitoring unmanned aerial vehicles; antennas and aerials as components; radar systems comprised of radar apparatus; radar apparatus; radio-frequency transmitters; radar jamming apparatus; radio signal jamming apparatus; video jamming apparatus, namely, electronic transmitters for jamming signals; counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS), namely, apparatus and instruments in the nature of GPS tracking devices, Satellite target trackers, electronic transmitters for jamming signals; radio frequency signal jammers, electronic transmitters for jamming radio frequency signals, computer hardware, and recorded or downloadable software for detecting, identifying, tracking, targeting, and countering unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); downloadable software for operating counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |