USPTO serial 79440697
SUPPRESSED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPPRESSED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Brand management services; business reputation management and improvement services; business consultancy; business management consultancy; consultancy relating to search engine optimization for sales promotion; statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in machine learning in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in database management in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in database management in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; providing online non-downloadable computer software for use in database management in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in database management in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; cloud computing services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in database management in the field of personal information monitoring and removal; computer software design; computer system design; computer security consultancy; consultancy and information services relating to information technology; web scraping services being data extraction; web crawling services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consultancy services relating to security services for the protection of property and individuals; domain name monitoring services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |