Drawing for BIG RIVER GEAR

USPTO serial 79440746

BIG RIVER GEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG RIVER GEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Santori

Rachel Santori Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC28 Liberty StreetNew York, NY 10005United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Hunting lures; fishing lures; lures for fishing; scent lures for hunting; scent lures for fishing; LED lures for fishing; artificial baits for fishing; synthetic baits for fishing; artificial ground baits for fishing; artificial fishing bait; camouflage screens for hunting, scent lures for hunting or fishing; hooks for fishing; boxes for fishing lures; fishing lure boxes; fishing fly boxes; bags adapted for fishing tackle; boxes for fishing flies; holdalls adapted for fishing tackles; fishing weights; fishing spinners.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance