Drawing for NATURESENSE

USPTO serial 79440830

NATURESENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNA, RENE NICOLE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 138

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURESENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Quan Nguyen

Quan Nguyen Nguyen Tarbet IP Law2474 E River RoadTucson, AZ 85718United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metal building materials, namely, coated or uncoated timber boards, boards made of wood particles, fiberboard or composite timber boards; panels; all for use as floors and wall and ceiling coverings; wood building materials, featuring load-bearing beams, boards, beams and decorative moldings for building construction; non-metal window sills; compact boards of wood; underlay for laminate flooringACTIVE—
027Floor mats; non-textile wall coveringsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 10, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 9, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2026SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance