Drawing for GENUS ECHO

USPTO serial 79440871

GENUS ECHO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENUS ECHO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Feeney

Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C.1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North WestSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software using Artificial intelligence software for automatic classification of objects and analysis of 3D and 2D data for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; downloadable software using Artificial intelligence software for quality analysis of objects for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; downloadable software using artificial intelligence and machine learning software for MRI data processing and the acceleration of magnetic resonance imaging for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; downloadable software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of big data for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; downloadable decision-making software for the classification of objects based on measurement data for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; image analyzers, namely, scanners for capturing images for analysis for use in the life science research field, image scanners, and MRI scanners, for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; magnetic resonance imaging apparatus, not for medical purposes for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; testing and quality control equipment, namely, imaging apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of images, and 3D scanners for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; non medical imaging devices for agricultural and food produce for scientific purposes for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; diagnostic apparatus for testing food for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; food analysis apparatus for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; testing apparatus and instruments for agricultural and food produce for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; all of the foregoing not in the fields of medical imaging, medical diagnostics, and biomedical research.ACTIVE—
042chemical analysis, namely, computerised food analysis services; testing, authentication and quality control of agricultural and food products; quality control of agricultural and food products; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neural networks for use in the non-medical analysis, classification, and sorting of agricultural and food products; all of the foregoing not in the fields of medical imaging, medical diagnostics, and biomedical researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance