Drawing for ASSETTO FIORANO

USPTO serial 79440890

ASSETTO FIORANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MASULLO, MARCO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSETTO FIORANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alison M. Caless

Alison M. Caless Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; wheel suspensions; vehicle suspension springs; door panels for land vehicles; shock absorbing springs for vehicles; wheel bearings for land vehicles; spoilers for vehicles; automobiles and structural parts therefor; cars; racing cars; motor cars; sports cars; electric cars; hybrid cars.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 18, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 17, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance