Drawing for FOOD BERRY

USPTO serial 79440968

FOOD BERRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JANSON, ANDREW KYLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD BERRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nazly Bayramoglu

Nazly Bayramoglu Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs RoadSuite 100Henderson, NV 89014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Soy sauce; gochujang; noodles; doenjang being soybean paste; rice cakes; instant noodles; Chinese noodles, uncooked; seasoned bean paste; stir-fried noodles with vegetables (japchae); Cooked prepared meals consisting primarily of stir-fried rice cake with fermented hot pepper paste (topokki); tea; Chun jang, namely, Chinese soybean pasteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2026OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance