USPTO serial 79440991
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany Kaur Singh
Brittany Kaur Singh Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern BoulevardRoslyn, NY 11576United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for metal working and metalworking machine tools; metalworking machines; none of the aforesaid goods being filling and sealing machines or parts thereof; casting machines for vacuum dosing, holding, manipulating and dosing of cast aluminium and filling of casting moulds. | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metal treating; woodworking; custom manufacture of materials for others; all the aforesaid services, not in relation to filling and sealing machines and related parts; metal casting. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; engineering services; preparation, namely, drafting of engineering drawings for others; conducting technical project studies; the aforesaid services, not in relation to filling and sealing machines and related parts; scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in relation to casting machines for vacuum dosing, holding, manipulating and dosing of cast aluminium and filling of casting moulds. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |