USPTO serial 79441032
BALANCEFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- URBAN,HENRY J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BALANCEFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils; shampoos; toilet soap; skin cleansers; non-medicated toiletry preparations; functional cosmetics in the nature of non-medicated skin care preparations; make-up; cosmetic preparations for skin care; mask pack for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; cosmetics for use on the skin; beauty masks; make-up foundations; cosmetic preparations for baths; body and beauty care cosmetics; sunscreen preparations; non-medicated balms for use on hair, skin and lips; compacts containing make-up; lavender oil; make-up removing milk, gels, lotions and creams. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |