Drawing for Serial No. 79441050

USPTO serial 79441050

Serial No. 79441050

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79441050?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison St., Suite AOak Park, IL 60302United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal pulleys; metal pulleys, worn on the body with the aid of a harness, for ergonomic working with various tools and garden tools.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 26, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance