USPTO serial 79441146
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey K. Cho
Corey K. Cho Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Eisenschenk, P.A.3107 SW Williston RdGainesville, FL 32608United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; functional cosmetics being non-medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations; sheet masks for neck for cosmetics use; anti-aging cosmetic preparations, namely, moisturizer, creams, non-medicated anti-aging serum; lip gloss; pores tightening mask packs used as cosmetics; pre-moistened cleansing tissues being pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; body mask lotions; body mask creams; non-medicated toiletry preparations; shampoos; sun block being cosmetics; skin moisturizer masks; cosmetic preparations for skin care; eye cream; cleansing preparations for personal use, namely, facial cleansing preparations, skin cleansing lotion, non-medicated cleansing water; skin whitening preparations; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; hand lotions; perfume | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |