Drawing for DUBAI

USPTO serial 79441172

DUBAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUBAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nyall Engfield

500 Westover Dr. #12298Sanford, NC 27330United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Energy drinks; energy drinks containing caffeine; energy drinks not for medical purposes; concentrates for use in the preparation of energy drinks.ACTIVE
035Retail services in relation to energy drinks; retail services in relation to energy drinks containing caffeine; retail services in relation to energy drinks not for medical purposes; retail services in relation to concentrates for use in the preparation of energy drinks; wholesale services in relation to energy drinks; wholesale services in relation to energy drinks containing caffeine; wholesale services in relation to energy drinks not for medical purposes; wholesale services in relation to concentrates for use in the preparation of energy drinks.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 29, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 29, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 18, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 17, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance