Drawing for POWER ASCENDER

USPTO serial 79441173

POWER ASCENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, MARISSA SHARPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER ASCENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bethany J. Whelan

Bethany J. Whelan Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrically powered windlasses, namely electrically driven rope winches for use in industrial maintenance, rope access, and rescue operations.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 7, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance