USPTO serial 79441224
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Fingerhut
Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett, PLLC1301 K Street, NWSuite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Flexible and insulated shaped parts and pipes, namely metal fittings for pipes and pipe systems consisting primarily of non-metallic flexible PE-Xa pipes reinforced with aramid fibers and incorporating aluminum barrier layers; sleeves of metal for pipe connections; insulated pipes of steel and copper; pipes of metal for liquid and gas transfer | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Non-metallic flexible pipes and tubes; insulation materials for pipes. | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Plastic pipes made of plastic materials for plumbing and construction purposes; plastic jacketed non-metal plastic pipes for district heating and cooling systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |