Drawing for Serial No. 79441730

USPTO serial 79441730

Serial No. 79441730

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 647Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with Serial No. 79441730?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Priscilla Lauren Speer

Priscilla Lauren Speer Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs RoadHenderson, NV 89014United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Printed circuits; integrated circuits; integrated circuit chips; electronic chips for the manufacture of integrated circuits; Encoded electronic chip cards for vehicle intelligent cockpit computing and in-vehicle data processing; printed circuit boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance