Drawing for ROCK SPLIT

USPTO serial 79441920

ROCK SPLIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILMOE, MAUREEN H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCK SPLIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo V. Gureff

Leo V. Gureff Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Calcium oxides; Mixtures consisting primarily of calcium oxides; Mixtures consisting primarily of calcium oxides and also containing cement; the aforementioned goods being non-explosive cracking agents for purposes of creating internal pressureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 14, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance