USPTO serial 79441987
LILYEVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MENTECKI,KATHERINE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with LILYEVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David D. Rodrigues
David D. Rodrigues Robinson & Cole LLP666 Third Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations for the scalp; pre-moistened cosmetic cleansing tissues; pre-moistened cleansing tissues for personal hygiene, namely, disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals for personal hygiene; beauty soap; beauty liquid, namely, liquid rouges, liquid eyeliners; non-medicated toiletry preparations; cosmetics for animals; essential oils; cosmetic nourishing creams; pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electric scalp massagers for household use; electric massage apparatus for household use; high frequency electromagnetic therapy apparatus; massaging apparatus for personal use; electric esthetic massage apparatus for household purposes; medical instruments, namely, applicators for pharmaceutical preparations; low frequency electromagnetic therapy apparatus; electric esthetic massage apparatus for household purposes; electric facial aesthetic treatment apparatus, other than facial steamers; LED masks for therapeutic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |