USPTO serial 79441992
KESH BY STEFA GONZáLEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KESH BY STEFA GONZáLEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos and hair care treatments; cosmetics and toiletries for care and cleaning of the skin and hair, soap for cleaning, shampoos; dentifrices; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations; non-medicinal soaps; perfumery products, essential oils, non-medicinal cosmetics, non-medicinal hair lotions; non-medicinal dentifrices; soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, cosmetic lotions, wipes impregnated with cosmetic lotions, moist wipes for cleaning for hygienic or cosmetic use; cosmetic preparations for baths, deodorants for personal use, depilatory preparations, make-up removing preparations, varnish removal preparations. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |