Drawing for HAPTIQ ANTI-DAMAGE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79442000

HAPTIQ ANTI-DAMAGE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER,AMANDA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAPTIQ ANTI-DAMAGE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aya Cieslak-Tochigi

Aya Cieslak-Tochigi Henkel CorporationONE HENKEL WAYLegal - TrademarksRocky Hill, CT 06067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical ingredients for use in the manufacture of cosmetic hair care, hair coloring and hair styling preparationsACTIVE—
003Non-medicated hair lotions; cosmetic preparations for care, cleaning, treating, coloring, tinting, bleaching, straightening, fixing, styling and waving of hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 21, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance