Drawing for CITIUS

USPTO serial 79442060

CITIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMARCO,JOE P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terry Wright

Terry Wright Stites & Harbison, PLLC400 West Market St.Suite 1800Louisville, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009measuring machines and instruments, namely, X-ray imaging detectors; testing machines and instruments, namely, X-ray imaging detectors; electric devices for measuring X-rays; electronic measuring apparatus, namely, X-ray imaging detectors and structural parts therefor; none of the foregoing for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2026CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 9, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 18, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 17, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance