Drawing for ONELEGAL

USPTO serial 79442104

ONELEGAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ANGOTTI, SALVATORE JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONELEGAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dmitriy O. Makarov

Dmitriy O. Makarov IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Rd, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-1768United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and preinstalled recorded computer, software suites, software applications, software platforms for facilitating the planning, integration and optimization of tasks linked to the legal function, namely reporting and analytics (provide legal KPIs, dashboards, and insights), contract management, legal document management (store, organize, and retrieve legal documents), Matter and litigation management (track legal cases, disputes, and deadlines), Compliance management, Corporate governance, legal request management (handle and track internal legal inquiries)ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 7, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 3, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 22, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance