Drawing for HEROINE MAKE

USPTO serial 79442111

HEROINE MAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TWAY, TATIANA R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEROINE MAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret McHugh

Margaret McHugh Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900San Francisco, CA 94111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Toilet utensils, namely, eye make-up applicator wands; eyelash combs; make-up removing appliances; eyelash brushes; face powder cases, being powder compacts, sold empty; cosmetic utensils, namely, eye make-up applicator wands, eyelash combs, make-up removing appliances, eyelash brushes; make-up sponges; make-up brushes; powder compacts; powder puffs; lip brushes; eyebrow brushes; cosmetic cream cases, sold empty; fitted vanity cases; perfume sprayers sold empty; nail brushesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 22, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 2, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 23, 2026LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 22, 2026SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance