USPTO serial 79442310
HOTOVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTOVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milos Poplar
Milos Poplar Fellow, Professional Legal Corporation1 Embarcadero Ctr Suite 1260San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable artificial intelligence and machine learning software for automating business processes, developing and deploying artificial intelligence applications, integrating enterprise software systems, and processing and analyzing business data; downloadable artificial intelligence software for automating business processes, developing and deploying artificial intelligence applications, integrating enterprise software systems, and processing and analyzing business data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultancy in the fields of custom software development, enterprise software and computer systems integration, software automation, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence integration and software consultancy services; computer software design and development; computer systems integration services; computer software development; computer programming and software design; consultancy relating to software design and development; computer software development for others; computer software consultancy services; software consultancy services; cloud computing services, namely, consulting in the fields of cloud-computing architecture, deployment, and integration of cloud-based software systems; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for automating business processes, developing and deploying artificial intelligence applications, integrating enterprise software systems, and analyzing business data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |