Drawing for DAM VINH HUNG

USPTO serial 79442332

DAM VINH HUNG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAUSS, JERAMEY WALLACE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAM VINH HUNG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jianmin Zhou

Jianmin Zhou Law Offices of James Zhou17700 Castleton St #568City of Industry, CA 91748United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Organization of art shows for cultural purposes; vocational training services in the field of music, art, acting, dance; cinematography services; film production, other than advertising films; educational counseling services to assist students in planning and preparing for further education, namely, assistance in choosing educational study abroad programs; providing karaoke services; discotheque services; arranging of conferences and seminars in the field of entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 6, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 5, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance