USPTO serial 79442802
TUFFKNOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 680 means the examining attorney approved your mark for publication in the USPTO Official Gazette. Publication for opposition usually follows within weeks, opening a 30-day window for third parties to oppose. Watch for publication (status 686) and monitor the 30-day opposition window.
Need help with TUFFKNOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus N. DiBuduo
Marcus N. DiBuduo Fennemore Craig, P.C.8080 N. Palm Ave., Third FloorFresno, CA 93711United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Wire; wire strand; wire mesh; fencing wire; non-electric multi-strand wire; non-electric single strand wire; metal fencing wire; metal cable wire; non-electric cables and wires of metal; wire fences; metal wire fences; metal wire fencing; fences of metal; metal fencing being metal fences; metallic fences. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |