USPTO serial 79442983
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason Rosenblum
Jason Rosenblum Law Office of Jason H. Rosenblum, PLLC155 Water StreetBrooklyn, NY 11201United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Battery charging service for motor vehicles; charging of electric vehicles; charging of electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles; charging station services for electric vehicles; installation, maintenance and repair of electric vehicle charging stations; installation, maintenance, repair of electrical charging stations; natural gas, electricity, propane fuel, and hydrogen gas refuelling service for motor vehicles by means of pumps, charging stations and dispensers; providing information in the field of electric vehicle charging station locations; technical consulting services in the field of electrical charging for vehicles; technical consulting services in the field of installation, maintenance and repair of electrical charging stations for electric vehicles; vehicle battery charging; vehicle service stations for charging electric vehicles; rental of charging stations for electric vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of central operating systems (COS) for electric vehicle charging networks; development of software for the management of charging stations for charging electric vehicles; engineering services in the field of electric vehicle charging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software for electrical charging stations; providing on-line, non-downloadable internet-based software application for locating available charging stations; providing online non-downloadable software for managing and operating electrical vehicle charge stations; providing software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for the remote management of electric vehicle charging stations; research and development services in the field of charging stations for electric vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |